Brief
|
|
At a Glance
With a recession looming and inflation persisting, companies are facing significant pressure to reset their cost base to stay competitive. As they search for savings, many managers turn to their back-office functions to close the gap, with cost programs often generating 20% to 40% savings through automation, process improvements, labor arbitrage, and other means. Most major companies have centralized back-office functions to some extent, from simple, single-function shared services focused on finance, HR, or IT, to more sophisticated, multifunction, integrated global business services (GBS). GBS organizations reduce costs, enhance performance, increase agility and scalability, and accelerate digital processes. However, full-fledged, broad-scale GBS remain rare. Business leaders often resist shared services beyond the most basic activities in finance, HR, and IT. Many business units or functions hesitate to expand shared services into higher-value activities, such as sales and marketing, or analytics in finance, because they do not trust a central group to perform effectively and generate valuable insights. As Bain & Company found in a recent survey of 935 GBS decision-makers worldwide, two-thirds of GBS or shared service organizations contain three or fewer service lines, and 40% contain only one. That narrow band of service lines prevents firms from reaping the full value of centralization within shared services, such as standardizing back-office processes, sharing investments in new technology to automate processes, or improving performance across the enterprise. One global consumer packaged goods company wanted to extend global shared services into new areas such as financial planning and analysis (FP&A). Before doing so, it had struggled to generate the scale, standardization, and alignment needed to simplify its monthly volume and revenue forecast process worldwide. Once these activities became shared services, the company could develop and deploy a machine-learning solution that collapsed the creation of a forecast from two weeks to several hours, eliminated manual error-prone work, and improved data accuracy and availability. To shift more work into GBS, companies must take a customer-centric view on how they deliver functions, much like how they approach external-customer-facing activities. Internal customers often want more than rote transaction execution; they seek responsive, tailored service experiences and a value-added partnership, just as external customers do. In the case of the consumer packaged goods company, to support monthly planning and decision-making, business unit finance leaders needed not only insightful analysis of historical business performance, with a tailored assessment of P&L variances, but also a view of future market opportunities within each country, considering factors such as macroeconomic trends, supply chain dynamics, customer wins and losses, and weather patterns. Transactional execution of standard reporting dashboards was not sufficient to support effective decision-making and build a partnership. Internal customers want to be heard, but shared services groups aren’t listeningWhile two-thirds of shared services organizations in our survey cite putting internal customers front and center as a top strategic priority, an alarming 68% of them do not even measure internal customer satisfaction. Further, while half of these companies use the Net Promoter Score (NPS)—the gold standard in measuring and improving customer advocacy—for external customers, only 8% of respondents use NPS for internal customers (see Figure 1). To calculate NPS, a company asks customers the ultimate question: On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend [company, brand, product, service] to a friend or relative?, Those answering 0 to 6 are detractors; 7 to 8 are passives; and 9 to 10 are promoters. The aggregate score derives from the percentage of promoters minus the percentage of detractors.
Figure 1
Although most companies realize the importance of customer experience, they are not applying the same level of rigor with internal customers. They rarely ask for feedback or benchmark performance. Shared services thus remain confined to low-value, transactional activities. And when companies force higher levels of adoption without fully accounting for customer needs, they often cause shadow processes and organizations to spring up, leading to duplicate work at higher costs. Leaders are beginning to pay attentionOur survey suggests this situation could soon change. Roughly 8% of firms we surveyed are starting to implement the metric, with another 12% planning to implement in the next 12 months. As companies have discovered with their external customers, the Net Promoter Score is more effective than measuring customer satisfaction because it measures advocacy and ultimately loyalty. Externally, companies with higher scores benefit from customers who stay longer, buy more, and tell their friends more often than competitors with lower scores. This results in lower costs to retain customers and acquire new ones, along with higher sales. While only a small number of shared services organizations currently use NPS, those that have adopted the Net Promoter Score find it effective, continue using it for long periods, and incorporate more services, our survey shows:
Consider how a large B2B services company used NPS to incorporate additional services into its global business services organization. After establishing a three-service-line GBS organization, the company engaged the team that focused on improving the external customer experience to deploy a similar tool kit within GBS. The team gathered internal customer feedback using NPS, built improvement plans in collaboration with internal customers, and delivered on those plans in a way that improved performance and built confidence among internal customers in GBS’ ability to add value to the business. Within two years, the organization expanded to operate nine service lines and was recognized by the Shared Services & Outsourcing Network (SSON) as among the most admired such organizations globally. Smith+Nephew, a medical technology company, has also relied on NPS for its GBS organization’s strategy. An automated NPS solution rapidly flags process improvement opportunities through alerts and AI-enabled sentiment analysis. Through effective listening to and acting on customer feedback, Smith+Nephew has improved processes customer satisfaction, and it was recognized by SSON as one of the 20 most admired organizations in 2022. The most mature GBS organizations do not simply track Net Promoter Score. They create a Net Promoter System surrounding the score, with a comprehensive, repeatable approach that puts customer priorities at the heart of operations. They have a closed-loop feedback system that engages the relevant service lines to develop and implement improvements based on listening to and acting on feedback. They assemble action plans with front-line customers as well as with business unit and function leaders, tailoring the approach for each group of stakeholders. And they consider absolute NPS alongside the more important trajectory and qualitative feedback. Our research shows that organizations that embed these actions are significantly more likely to achieve higher customer satisfaction as measured by NPS (see Figure 2).
Figure 2
For example, AB InBev, the world’s leading beer company, has been able to improve performance in its Global Capability Center (GCC) through extensive deployment of NPS practices, including closed-loop feedback mechanisms, an automated NPS technology solution to identify issues and track follow-ups, and the establishment of a customer experience lead position. These practices helped improve performance in areas such as treasury, where internal customers were not fully satisfied with the speed of cash disbursement in certain situations, and sales support, where existing metrics did not fully capture evolving customer expectations. The company’s efforts helped the GCC dramatically improve its Net Promoter Score by 110 points from 2019 to 2022, while increasing response rates from 16% to 66%. Shared services organizations can also use NPS feedback to identify other systemic issues that degrade the internal experience and route them to the right parts of the organization to review and take action. For instance, they can flag that a sales team should gather critical data from customers in initial discussions to avoid delays later in the process. Making the most of a Net Promoter SystemImplementing the Net Promoter System with internal customers requires thoughtful application, and should include all of these features:
Companies that want to establish a Net Promoter System for their shared services or GBS can follow these steps:
As companies tighten their belts to deal with the current economic uncertainty, expanding the use of shared services is a natural way to contain costs. But along with that expansion comes a responsibility to perform at high standards, or else risk resistance among employees and managers. Embedding the Net Promoter System is the surest way to catch problems early, improve performance in support of business outcomes, and earn the right to integrate even more services into a global group. |