Report

Creating Value in Tech through Constant Reinvention

Leading companies find ways to win platform transitions.

By David Crawford, Ravi Vijayaraghavan, and Chris Johnson

First published on octubre 14, 2020
min read


This article is Chapter 3 of Bain’s global Technology Report 2020. Explore the contents of the report here or download the PDF to read the full report. The largest value-creating transformations in technology involve two things: winning a platform battle, and accelerating growth by either repositioning the core business or extending its capabilities into new domains. The highest-valued technology companies are all platform winners that established their successful platforms as a market transition unfolded. There’s Microsoft with Azure and Office 365, Amazon with e-commerce and Amazon Web Services, Google with search and Android, Facebook with social media, Adobe with Creative Cloud, and so on. The term “platform” is often used broadly. Here, we use it very specifically to indicate a product or service upon which others build their livelihood—one that attracts an ecosystem of partners and customers who collectively deliver value. The concept is as old as road widths, but is more prevalent in the technology sector than other industries. Now, it’s becoming more critical as abundant foundational infrastructure such as cloud computing and mobile communications has enabled global, interconnected platforms to rapidly scale up. The playbook for establishing a successful platform is no secret: mobilize early, offer the best ecosystem economics, win the anchor partners and customers, scale up the business, and extend and deepen customer engagement. However, the specifics of each platform strategy vary, and the journey is fraught with pitfalls. A platform by nature creates so-called network effects that can result in attractive economics and a winner-takes-most dynamic. As a result, platform battles are usually hotly contested, with intense races to scale. The key to the other half of the value-creation equation depends on where a technology company falls in its life cycle—disruptor or incumbent. When a company already has a mature platform-based business model, the formula for value creation involves repositioning the core business as the market transition occurs. When a company’s platforms are still nascent and growing, the formula for value creation more often involves extending them into new domains. The core repositioning formula is particularly potent if the market has concluded such a repositioning is unlikely. Examples include Microsoft’s and Adobe’s repositioning around the cloud, and Nvidia’s repositioning from mobile devices to graphics and the data center, as artificial intelligence growth exploded (see Figures 1 through 3). Figure 1 Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business Figure 2 Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business Figure 3 Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business These transitions can be tricky. The new platform can pose conflicts for the old by cannibalizing the core business and alienating existing partners or customers. The better today’s business is performing, the greater the resistance to change. But waiting until growth slows is often too late. Adobe timed the refocus of its core business well. In 2011, the US-based company charged $700 for a copy of its Photoshop software, available only on compact discs. CEO Shantanu Narayen decided to begin switching to a software-as-a-service model in which Adobe licensed a bundle of programs starting at $50 per month, delivered through the cloud. Adobe was making a big bet that its new Creative Cloud would make it a stronger company in the long run, even if it took a hit initially. The transition likely gave Adobe executives heartburn. From 2011 to 2014, the company’s total annual revenue declined slightly from $4.2 billion to $4.1 billion, as its boxed software business shrank. But the Creative Cloud quickly began to deliver on its promise. In 2014, Adobe’s annualized recurring revenue was $1.6 billion for the segment that includes Creative Cloud. By 2019, the bet had paid off in a big way. Annualized recurring revenue for the Creative Cloud segment had swelled to $7.3 billion. The company had 89% recurring revenue, and its stock price was trading at more than 50 times its earnings. From 2010 to 2019, Adobe’s market value jumped from $16 billion to $153 billion. Of course, many companies have missed the opportunity to refocus their businesses, and ended up worse off. Nokia, for example, was unable to adapt its feature phone business for the smartphone era. In the years following the introduction of the Apple iPhone, Nokia lost billions of dollars in market value and ended up selling its handset unit. Technology companies in a high-growth phase face a different set of challenges when trying to extend their capabilities to create new businesses. The trick is to find the sweet spot where the organization’s strengths match a promising market opportunity. Examples include Amazon’s extension into cloud-computing services with AWS; Apple’s extension into mobile media devices, smartphones and media content; and Alibaba Group’s extension into payments, cloud computing and digital transformation of businesses. These companies built on their core strengths to reach new customers, deepen their relationships with existing ones, or accomplish both (see Figures 4 through 6). Figure 4 Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict Figure 5 Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict Figure 6 Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict Alibaba Group has successfully navigated several business extensions. From the start, the China-based company’s main growth engine has been online marketplaces. But five years after the company’s 1999 launch, its leaders took advantage of the organization’s e-commerce know-how and created an online payments service called Alipay. That product was later spun out as Ant Group, now one of the largest financial-technology firms headquartered in China. As Alibaba’s popularity grew, it had to build a massive computing infrastructure to handle the millions of transactions on its various e-commerce platforms. Company leaders realized they could turn those assets and their experience into a new business offering third-party cloud-computing services. Alibaba Cloud was born in 2009 and had grown to $3.7 billion in annual revenue a decade later. More recently, Alibaba has made a push to help enterprises digitally transform their businesses with the help of its analytic capabilities and expertise spanning e-commerce, cloud computing, financial technology, supply chains, sales and marketing, and consumer insights. Alibaba’s series of business extensions have made it one of the most valuable technology companies in the world, with a market capitalization of $455 billion at the end of its 2019 fiscal year. Whether a company needs to reposition or extend its core business, the essential job of management is to deeply understand the transition occurring in its sector and create a plan built around the firm’s strengths. This encompasses not only its strategic products and services, but also its operational capabilities and employees’ skills and expertise. Once the company has lined up its competencies with the sector’s evolution, it can invest strategically in product and service expansions, partnerships, and mergers and acquisitions to navigate the market transition quickly and successfully. Read the Next Chapter Beyond Moore’s Law: Capture Value from Data

This article is Chapter 3 of Bain’s global Technology Report 2020. Explore the contents of the report here or download the PDF to read the full report.

The largest value-creating transformations in technology involve two things: winning a platform battle, and accelerating growth by either repositioning the core business or extending its capabilities into new domains.

The highest-valued technology companies are all platform winners that established their successful platforms as a market transition unfolded. There’s Microsoft with Azure and Office 365, Amazon with e-commerce and Amazon Web Services, Google with search and Android, Facebook with social media, Adobe with Creative Cloud, and so on.

The term “platform” is often used broadly. Here, we use it very specifically to indicate a product or service upon which others build their livelihood—one that attracts an ecosystem of partners and customers who collectively deliver value. The concept is as old as road widths, but is more prevalent in the technology sector than other industries. Now, it’s becoming more critical as abundant foundational infrastructure such as cloud computing and mobile communications has enabled global, interconnected platforms to rapidly scale up.

The playbook for establishing a successful platform is no secret: mobilize early, offer the best ecosystem economics, win the anchor partners and customers, scale up the business, and extend and deepen customer engagement. However, the specifics of each platform strategy vary, and the journey is fraught with pitfalls. A platform by nature creates so-called network effects that can result in attractive economics and a winner-takes-most dynamic. As a result, platform battles are usually hotly contested, with intense races to scale.

The key to the other half of the value-creation equation depends on where a technology company falls in its life cycle—disruptor or incumbent. When a company already has a mature platform-based business model, the formula for value creation involves repositioning the core business as the market transition occurs. When a company’s platforms are still nascent and growing, the formula for value creation more often involves extending them into new domains.

The core repositioning formula is particularly potent if the market has concluded such a repositioning is unlikely. Examples include Microsoft’s and Adobe’s repositioning around the cloud, and Nvidia’s repositioning from mobile devices to graphics and the data center, as artificial intelligence growth exploded (see Figures 1 through 3).

Chart showing how Adobe navigated market transitions by repositioning its core businesses. — Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business

Chart showing how Microsoft navigated market transitions by repositioning its core businesses. — Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business

Chart showing how Nvidia navigated market transitions by repositioning its core businesses. — Some technology leaders navigate market transitions by repositioning their core business

These transitions can be tricky. The new platform can pose conflicts for the old by cannibalizing the core business and alienating existing partners or customers. The better today’s business is performing, the greater the resistance to change. But waiting until growth slows is often too late.

Adobe timed the refocus of its core business well. In 2011, the US-based company charged $700 for a copy of its Photoshop software, available only on compact discs. CEO Shantanu Narayen decided to begin switching to a software-as-a-service model in which Adobe licensed a bundle of programs starting at $50 per month, delivered through the cloud. Adobe was making a big bet that its new Creative Cloud would make it a stronger company in the long run, even if it took a hit initially.

The transition likely gave Adobe executives heartburn. From 2011 to 2014, the company’s total annual revenue declined slightly from $4.2 billion to $4.1 billion, as its boxed software business shrank. But the Creative Cloud quickly began to deliver on its promise. In 2014, Adobe’s annualized recurring revenue was $1.6 billion for the segment that includes Creative Cloud. By 2019, the bet had paid off in a big way. Annualized recurring revenue for the Creative Cloud segment had swelled to $7.3 billion. The company had 89% recurring revenue, and its stock price was trading at more than 50 times its earnings. From 2010 to 2019, Adobe’s market value jumped from $16 billion to $153 billion.

Of course, many companies have missed the opportunity to refocus their businesses, and ended up worse off. Nokia, for example, was unable to adapt its feature phone business for the smartphone era. In the years following the introduction of the Apple iPhone, Nokia lost billions of dollars in market value and ended up selling its handset unit.

Technology companies in a high-growth phase face a different set of challenges when trying to extend their capabilities to create new businesses. The trick is to find the sweet spot where the organization’s strengths match a promising market opportunity. Examples include Amazon’s extension into cloud-computing services with AWS; Apple’s extension into mobile media devices, smartphones and media content; and Alibaba Group’s extension into payments, cloud computing and digital transformation of businesses. These companies built on their core strengths to reach new customers, deepen their relationships with existing ones, or accomplish both (see Figures 4 through 6).

Chart showing how Amazon extended its core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict. — Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict

Chart showing how Apple extended its core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict. — Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict

Chart showing how Alibaba Group extended its core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict. — Some technology leaders extend core capabilities into new domains with low customer conflict

Alibaba Group has successfully navigated several business extensions. From the start, the China-based company’s main growth engine has been online marketplaces. But five years after the company’s 1999 launch, its leaders took advantage of the organization’s e-commerce know-how and created an online payments service called Alipay. That product was later spun out as Ant Group, now one of the largest financial-technology firms headquartered in China.

As Alibaba’s popularity grew, it had to build a massive computing infrastructure to handle the millions of transactions on its various e-commerce platforms. Company leaders realized they could turn those assets and their experience into a new business offering third-party cloud-computing services. Alibaba Cloud was born in 2009 and had grown to $3.7 billion in annual revenue a decade later.

More recently, Alibaba has made a push to help enterprises digitally transform their businesses with the help of its analytic capabilities and expertise spanning e-commerce, cloud computing, financial technology, supply chains, sales and marketing, and consumer insights. Alibaba’s series of business extensions have made it one of the most valuable technology companies in the world, with a market capitalization of $455 billion at the end of its 2019 fiscal year.

Whether a company needs to reposition or extend its core business, the essential job of management is to deeply understand the transition occurring in its sector and create a plan built around the firm’s strengths. This encompasses not only its strategic products and services, but also its operational capabilities and employees’ skills and expertise. Once the company has lined up its competencies with the sector’s evolution, it can invest strategically in product and service expansions, partnerships, and mergers and acquisitions to navigate the market transition quickly and successfully.

Read the Next Chapter

Beyond Moore’s Law: Capture Value from Data