Bain uses cookies to improve functionality and performance of this site. More information can be found in our Privacy Policy. By continuing to browse this site, you consent to the use of cookies.

Bangkok Post

Sometimes Companies Need to Break Up Too. Is It Time to Split Up?

Sometimes Companies Need to Break Up Too. Is It Time to Split Up?

Corporate break-ups may be in vogue, but are they worth it?

  • March 23, 2015
  • min read

Article

Sometimes Companies Need to Break Up Too. Is It Time to Split Up?

This article originally appeared in the Bangkok Post .

Each week brings with it news of the latest multi-business public company looking to ignite shareholder returns by separating. Sometimes compelled by external pressure from activist investment funds, spinoffs are taking place across a range of industries. HP Inc and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, eBay and PayPal are among the most recent examples, and the list keeps growing.

Corporate break-ups may be in vogue, but are they worth it? Separations are costly; one-time costs typically amount to 1% to 2% of revenue, sometimes more for the most complex separations. They're time-consuming, too, generally taking 12 to 18 months from decision to close. As anyone who has embarked on a separation can attest, they're also resource-intensive and distracting for an organisation, causing a high degree of inward focus.

The big question for boards and CEOs pondering such a move is, "Does the break-up succeed in creating shareholder value?" The answer is, "sometimes". We determined this by analysing the performance 18 months post-separation of 40 transactions involving companies valued at more than US$1 billion in the 2001 to 2010 time frame. We focused on deals in which two separate public companies were formed out of a portfolio in which there had been some level of strategic and operational integration.

Based on our analysis, the top third of separations delivered significant value: The combined market cap of the new businesses after separation exceeded their pre-spin value by more than 50%. That's the good news. But in another one-third of the cases, the combined market cap of the new companies was 40% less than their pre-spin value 18 months after separating.

Read the full article in the Bangkok Post.

Andy Pasternak is a partner with Bain & Company's Chicago office, Jim Wininger is a partner with Bain's Atlanta office, and Satish Shankar is a partner with Bain's Singapore office.

Tags

Ready to talk?

We work with ambitious leaders who want to define the future, not hide from it. Together, we achieve extraordinary outcomes.