Turn Artificial Intelligence into Proprietary Intelligence

How to Win with AI

Decision 2: Domain Focus

Decision 2: Domain Focus

Only the CEO can unlock the constraints that matter.

By Sarah Elk, Chuck Whitten, Hernan Saenz, Gene Rapoport, Nicolas Bloch,
Pascal Gautheron, and Anne Hoecker

Once committed, where you place your bets is the most consequential decision.
  • The most valuable AI transformations require the CEO to sponsor workflow redesign. Only top-down authority can break job definitions, organizational silo boundaries, legacy process ownership, and entrenched incentives that bottom-up programs work around rather than eliminate.
  • The single biggest execution mistake is spreading AI across too many use cases. Concentrating resources on three to five domains beats broad coverage every time.
  • The right domains sit at the intersection of competitive advantage, proprietary data, and end-to-end reinvention potential, not where AI is easiest to deploy.
  • Transforming the most critical workflows at the heart of the business demands a human-centered redesign. It requires trust from the CEO to frontline employees, built through honest communication about what AI augmentation means, whether through growth opportunities, upskilling, reskilling, or potential job displacement.
  • Real transformation requires a multiyear investment horizon with funding committed ahead of P&L impact. CEOs who demand in-year returns will systematically select the wrong activities, optimizing for what is easy to justify rather than what is competitively decisive.

Why spreading your AI bets destroys value

Choosing where to focus is the decision that determines whether your AI program creates competitive advantage or just generates activity. Most organizations default to breadth as they run AI initiatives across dozens of functions, fund whatever teams are most enthusiastic, and measure success by the number of use cases in the portfolio. This approach feels inclusive and low risk. It is neither. It dilutes scarce talent and leadership attention across problems that are too small to matter, and it produces a portfolio of incremental improvements rather than the step-change transformations that reshape competitive position.

The right answer is concentration. Pick two or three domains where AI can change the economics of how you compete. It goes beyond automating a task to fundamentally reshaping a workflow, a customer experience, or a cost structure. Put the majority of your resources, your best people, and your personal attention there.

The domains worth betting on share three characteristics:

  1. They sit close to the sources of competitive advantage in your business
  2. They are data-rich enough to give AI agents real signals to reason from
  3. They are end-to-end in scope, meaning that reimagining them requires changing multiple steps in a process rather than just automating one

At this point, the CEO’s personal involvement is not optional. The most valuable workflow redesigns require breaking constraints that no middle manager or transformation team has the authority to break because job definitions have been codified in HR systems for decades, organizational boundaries reflect political history rather than business logic, process ownership arrangements protect functional fiefdoms, and incentive structures reward the status quo. Only the CEO can walk into those conversations with the authority to say: This changes. Bottom-up programs work around these constraints. Top-down sponsorship eliminates them.

Why only the CEO can break the constraints that matter

The CEO is also the one person who can create trust and a renewed social contract with the employee base. When done right, redesigning workflows is fundamentally human-centric, meaning the people whose jobs are most impacted positively or negatively are part of the redesign process. Employees whose work may be augmented or redefined need to understand the implications for them personally. If time is freed up, are we reinvesting that productivity for growth? Do we need fewer of that job, and do we plan to reskill people in other strategic roles in the business? What choices will be given to employees, or will they be told what will happen to them?

85

of CEOs are using AI to prioritize near-term cost reduction and productivity improvements

Bain’s CEO survey finds that roughly 85% of CEOs are using AI primarily to fund the journey, prioritizing near-term cost reduction and productivity improvements over the harder, slower work of competitive reinvention. That instinct is understandable, and there is real value in self-funding the program through early gains. But it becomes a problem when it crowds out the resources needed to actually reshape competitive position.

The investment horizon is equally important. If you require every domain bet to show in-year ROI, you will systematically fund the wrong activities. The use cases that produce quick, measurable returns are rarely the ones that create lasting competitive advantage. They are the ones that are easiest to execute, most similar to what you have done before, and most legible to a finance team that is used to evaluating traditional technology investments. The transformations that reshape competitive position take time to design, build, and scale. Funding them requires a CEO willing to commit capital before proof and a board that understands why that commitment is strategically necessary.

  • AI TRANSFORMATION: ENTERPRISE GLOSSARY

Vuoi continuare la conversazione?

Aiutiamo i leader globali e le loro aziende ad affrontare problemi e a cogliere le opportunità. Sosteniamo cambiamenti e otteniamo risultati duraturi.